|
|
 |
| [Oct 03, 2011, 8:51 pm ET] - Share - Viewing Comments |
The Word of Notch offers a "short response" to some criticism in an editorial on Kotaku based on the recent release of legal documents related to the court battle over the Scrolls trademark. He explains that Mojang actually offered to give up the trademark, but Bethesda seems determined to go to court nonetheless: I just saw this:
http://kotaku.com/5846111/mojang-v-bethesda-or-i-hate-it-when-mommy-and-daddy-fight
I feel the need to clarify a couple of things:
We realized we should apply for the trademark “Minecraft” to protect our brand. When doing so, we also sent in an application for “Scrolls”. When Bethesda contacted us, we offered both to change the name to “Scrolls: <some subtitle>” and to give up the trademark.
They refused on both counts.
Whatever reason they have for suing us, it’s not a fear of us having a trademark on the word “Scrolls”, as we’ve offered to give that up.
Post Comment
Enter the details of the comment
you'd like to post in the boxes below and click the button at
the bottom of the form.
 |
| 23. |
Re: Valve Single Player Clarification |
Oct 4, 2011, 05:11 |
Optimaximal |
|
|
To me, the Kotaku article is misleading (and seems to have an agenda to boot).
Notice how they transparently change the claim against Mojang from 'Scrolls' - which, with the capitalisation, is distinct and can relate to a product - to 'scrolls', which defines the word itself - something that would never be granted, as you cannot trademark a genericized word. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
.. ..
Copyright © 1996-2013 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.