|
|
 |
| [Sep 22, 2011, 10:38 am ET] - Share - Viewing Comments |
GameSpy - Should Diablo III have been first person?
I'll admit it. My first ever hands-on time with any Diablo game occurred just 24 hours ago, when my inexperienced Demon Hunter took his first fumbling steps into the Diablo III beta's dark and ominous dungeons. It took just three hours before I'd hacked and slashed my way to the main storyline's satisfying conclusion, but in that short period of time my eyes were opened to an entirely new perspective on a gaming world. As a lover of first person games, the isometric camera system in Diablo III felt very unfamiliar, and I inevitably wondered why Blizzard didn't make the leap to first person like so many other developers. This led me to wonder - should Diablo III have been a first person game, and what are the pros and cons of this approach? Let's find out.
Post Comment
Enter the details of the comment
you'd like to post in the boxes below and click the button at
the bottom of the form.
 |
| 37. |
Re: Op Ed |
Sep 22, 2011, 16:48 |
Creston |
|
|
eunichron wrote on Sep 22, 2011, 16:17: And this is the guy that is editor-in-chief of Gamespy. If your rag of a website has faded into obscurity for the past eight years, you have to do SOMETHING to get traffic. It actually speaks more to the absolute pathetic state most gaming websites are in that pretty much all of them have to resort to trolling 101 in order to get hits.
So, good on you, Gamespy. Your thirteen year old mouthbreather of an editor got you a few hits, and your continued slide into obsolescence continues unabated.
Creston |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
.. ..
Copyright © 1996-2013 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.