|
|
 |
| [Nov 02, 2010, 7:32 pm ET] - Share - Viewing Comments |
Post Comment
Enter the details of the comment
you'd like to post in the boxes below and click the button at
the bottom of the form.
 |
| 9. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Nov 3, 2010, 06:13 |
Golwar |
|
|
Prez wrote on Nov 3, 2010, 05:53: This is what the Supreme Court is trying to decide. The question before them is not "Should games be allowed to be sold to minors?" Rather it is "Does the government have the right to intervene in this matter at all?" Another important distinction.
Well, I'm not an american but I'd say that your summary is wrong. The question is a combination of both and not just one or the other.
The question is more: Is the potential harm to kids so high and the alternative industry based self control effective enough, or is the intervention of the government justified? That the government has the right, when the required circumstances are given, shouldn't be in doubt (as this already happens with porn etc.). The question is if the gaming industry, in its current state, offers those circumstances.
This comment was edited on Nov 3, 2010, 06:21. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
.. ..
Copyright © 1996-2013 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.