|
|
 |
| [Apr 18, 2003, 1:20 pm ET] - Share - Viewing Comments |
Washington state bans sale of violent video games
on CNN Money has news that the state of Washington is on the verge of
explicitly outlawing the sale of violent computer and video games to anyone under
the age of 17, as a bill to this effect has passed the senate, and is expected
to be signed into law by Governor Gary Locke (D). Rather than being broadly
aimed though, the bill "specifically mentions those that depict violence
against law enforcement officials," with the article suggesting that Grand
Theft Auto Vice City was a specific catalyst for this measure. The article
offers quotes from both sides of this issue, and touches upon the question of
interpretation that's being raised by those who feel the law's wording might be
too vague. The article offers handy updates on other related legislation:
In Washington, D.C., Sen. Joe Baca, D.-Calif., has resurrected his
"Protect Children from Video Game Sex and Violence Act" for the second
year. The
bill would make it a federal crime to sell or rent "adult video
games" to minors – with proposed fines of $5,000 or more. Re-introduced
to the House on Feb. 11, the bill is currently in the Subcommittee on Crime,
Terrorism, and Homeland Security. The 2002 bill of the same name died in that
committee.
At the same time, Sen. Joseph Lieberman, D.-Conn., who has been a long-time
critic of the video game industry, plans to introduce legislation to fund a
study on how exposure to different types of media affects players. When
proposing the legislation at a research symposium, the presidential candidate
made sure to single out video games.
Meanwhile, the gaming industry is currently awaiting a ruling from the U.S. 8th
Circuit Court of Appeals on its attempt to overturn a St. Louis law, which bans
the sale of violent video games to minors. A lower court upheld
those restrictions a year ago.
Post Comment
Enter the details of the comment
you'd like to post in the boxes below and click the button at
the bottom of the form.
 |
| 54. |
Re: Comments |
Apr 18, 2003, 16:45 |
Spiders |
|
|
Firstly, thank you Moonbender for clarifying what I perhaps should have initially made more clear.
And ethic, I don't support forced abortions, I don't even know where that accusation came from. But I also don't think that anyone should be allowed to have all the kids they want whenever they want - and that's my own personal opinion. I'm not saying people shouldn't be allowed to have children, by the way, however you should be able to care for them, support them, and guide/teach them. I don't know what the standard is or would be, I don't claim to know, nor would I envy the person whose responsibility it was to do so - I don't even know if it's possible. I DO know that you have to be able to show you can do those things for a dog or cat you get from the pound, why not a child - it seems to me that they need the assurance just as much, if not more.
Finally, I welcome discourse and the opinions of others. For better or worse, the only opinion I have is my own, however I am always willing to consider the perspectives of others - especially regarding an issue like this on a site like this, where everyone may agree or disagree but feels strongly about the topic and is familiar enough with the industry to discuss it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
.. ..
Copyright © 1996-2013 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
Twitter 
