Post Comment - Blue's News

Out of the Blue

[Nov 28, 2012, 10:49 am ET] - Share - Viewing Comments

The oncoming cold I mentioned yesterday already seems to be outgoing, as my sore throat is abating, and it doesn't seem it's being replaced by any further symptoms. The worst of it as this point is that I'm constantly clearing my throat, which as George Costanza taught us is "a non-verbal implication of doubt." Hopefully I won't accidentally imply I suspect anyone of murder.

Cleared Links:	Thanks Ant and Acleacius.
Play:	Dikembe Mutombo's 4 1/2 Weeks to Save the World. Dragon Fist 3D.
Stories:	Hobbit was almost filmed in Britain, director reveals.
Science:	Pork Safety - What's in Pork ? Consumer Reports. Interactions Between Grapefruits And Drugs Can Cause Severe Effects, Death.
Media:	Game of Thrones Sitcom. Ninten-blow. Dog Helps Firefighters to Pull Down Tree. Giant shopping cart takes Chevy engine to move. Pretty sure any engine would do.
Auction:	‘Casablanca’ piano to be auctioned off, expected to go for $1.2 million.
The Funnies:	Brevity.
Follow-up:	US coastal cities in danger as sea levels rise faster than expected, study warns.

Post Comment
Enter the details of the comment you'd like to post in the boxes below and click the button at the bottom of the form.

15.

Re: Out of the Blue

Nov 28, 2012, 16:23

NegaDeath

Agent.X7 wrote on Nov 28, 2012, 15:53: You don't think GREEN is a HUGE business right now? I see this argument a lot but it never makes sense to me. Ok so there's a lot of money in the green industry. There is an obscenely greater amount of money in "anti-green" industries...literally the most profitable industries on the whole planet. If money is your indicator of corruption then you have the wrong bad guy. "Any scientist that claims they know one way or the other is LYING. They are lying because they want to be right, or get grant money, or corporate money. Period. " There are things that can be tested and unequivocally proven through science and need to be presented as such. I don't know enough about the climate to claim they're 100% correct but the idea no scientist can be completely sure about something is bunk. As for Stephen Hawking he's a theoretical physicist. The field of study is too different to be compared to climate science, or biology or geology or anything else that deals with our material world for that matter.

Subject

Comment Enter your comment here, but please respect the forum rules (below).

;) :( :o %) :) :| ;P X| :D More

If you have a signature set up, it will be automatically appended to your comment.
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.

Email me when this topic is updated.

Special Codes

b[bold text]b
i[italic text]i
u[underline text]u
-[~~strikethrough text~~]-
c[code text]c
+[bullet point]+
q[quote text (indented)]q
[quote="Author"]quote text (indented)[/quote]
[url=Link]text[/url]
r{red text}r
g{green text}g
b{blue text}b
m{maroon text}m
s{secret text (shows in the background colour)}s

Forum Rules

Disagree all you want but attacks of a personal nature will not be tolerated.
Ethnic slurs and homophobic language will not be tolerated.
Do not post spam, links to warez sites, or instructions on how to obtain pirated software.
Abusing the forums in any manner that could be construed as 'griefing' will not be tolerated.