|
|
 |
| [Oct 28, 2012, 1:49 pm ET] - Share - Viewing Comments |
The Witcher Forums have some tidbits from Piotr Gnyp's Twitter Feed with some tidbits from an upcoming interview with CD Projekt RED that reveal some of their plans (thanks Gamer's Hell). Here's their summary:
- Unnanounced dark fantasy title (Witcher 3?) is in more advanced stages than Cyberpunk 2077.
- Cyberpunk 2077 is the first in a series, both games are larger than The Witcher, both are multiplaform
- 2013 will be smaller stuff for CDP RED, no Witcher-caliber release
- Witcher for iPhone - too early to say anything, but not impossible
EDIT: missed some stuff:
- no Witcher for PS3 next year, they want TW on Playstation, but not current gen
- both TW3 and CP2077 will appear on next gen consoles
Post Comment
Enter the details of the comment
you'd like to post in the boxes below and click the button at
the bottom of the form.
 |
| 9. |
Re: CD Projekt RED Plans/Rumors |
Oct 29, 2012, 01:17 |
Slashman |
|
|
Optional Nickname! wrote on Oct 28, 2012, 23:04:
Slashman wrote on Oct 28, 2012, 22:35:
Quinn wrote on Oct 28, 2012, 20:25:
Overon wrote on Oct 28, 2012, 19:02:
It is right to love CD Projekt Red. If you do not love the, then you are wrong :p
This.
CD Projekt... the developer that removed the DRM from their release in a patch, without communicating it to their publishers. Haha, fuckign heroes!
They got sued for that...
According to: http://digibutter.nerr.biz/topics/178989
/namco-bandai-wins-in-witcher-2-distribution-dispute
(URL too long)
"The court did not venture an opinion on Namco Bandai's suggestion that CD Projekt had violated their agreement by spontaneously disabling DRM from PC versions of The Witcher 2."
However, that same French court did hold that Namco Bandai was entitled to The Witcher 2 distribution in the Western Europe, Central or South America, and the Asia-Pacific regions, not THQ as CD Projekt asserted.
Does that mean that it was never really brought up in court by Namco Bandai then?
The court would have to give some kind of ruling if it was part of the case. Either they were guilty of violating the agreement or they weren't. Or maybe they settled that part of it out of court. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
.. ..
Copyright © 1996-2013 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
Twitter 
